Skip to main content
Eligible orders over US$80 ship free by sea No minimum order US · UK · CA · AU
Public trust hub · index, follow · evidence is labeled by truth state: Verified & Public / Process Standard / Evidence Coming.
Trust Hub / Evidence Architecture

Quality, Sourcing & Product Evidence

Traceable Records · Product-Specific Testing · Clear Evidence Levels

SanYuan Herbs treats quality as a recorded relationship between a product, its materials, its batch and the evidence that applies to it.

We separate sourcing records, product specifications, batch traceability, COAs, laboratory reports, first-party tests and market-specific product records instead of hiding everything behind a generic “quality” badge.

Verified & PublicProcess StandardEvidence Coming
Primary QueryHerbal Product Quality Testing
TraceabilitySupplier / Lot / Batch / SKU
Evidence LibrarySpecific reports live separately
ReleaseIndex now · enrich evidence later

Short Answer

How does SanYuan Herbs approach herbal product quality testing? We separate supplier and sourcing records, product specifications, batch/lot traceability, COAs, independent laboratory reports, first-party tests and market-specific product records. A test result is presented only as evidence for the material, product, batch and conditions it actually covers.

Quality is a system, not one badge

What “Quality” Means at SanYuan Herbs

Different questions require different evidence. Identity, specification, traceability, testing, product performance and market readiness should not be collapsed into one generic “premium quality” statement.

01 · Identity

Is it the material claimed?

Common name, scientific name when claimed, plant part, material form and formula identity should remain aligned with the product.

02 · Specification

What exactly was ordered?

Grade, species, size, formula, physical characteristics and other specifications belong in the record when they matter.

03 · Traceability

Can it be linked to a supplier and lot?

Supplier, purchase reference, supplier lot, SanYuan lot, product batch and SKU create the chain.

04 · Safety / Contaminants

What was actually tested?

Relevant contaminant or microbiological testing should name the sample, scope, issuer, date and result.

05 · Performance

Was the property measured?

Low-smoke, warming, wavelength, adhesion, bag integrity or compatibility should be backed by method-specific evidence.

06 · Market Readiness

Does the current product match its market record?

Labels, instructions, warnings, specifications and regulatory identity should match the current SKU and target market.

Regulatory status and product-quality evidence are related but not interchangeable. Legal sale, notification or registration does not automatically mean a product is clinically superior, safer or “higher quality.”
Evidence ladder

Our Evidence Levels

Not every SKU needs the same evidence depth. The important part is showing what level actually exists instead of presenting every supplier record as if it were a repeated independent laboratory dataset.

E1

Purchase / Supplier Record

Supplier, item/material name, date and purchase/lot reference.

Supports source-chain evidence
E2

Supplier Specification

Material grade, declared species/part, dimensions, composition or origin where supplied.

Specification evidence
E3

Identity / Product Verification

Material identification, formula version, label/BOM match and product image.

Product-identity evidence
E4

COA

Analytical or specification results connected to material, lot, issuer and date.

Issuer type must be visible
E5

Independent Laboratory Report

A separate laboratory performs an appropriate analytical or physical test.

Independent only when truly independent
E6

Repeated First-Party Dataset

Multiple samples/batches with repeatable methods, photos, results, limitations and review.

Highest internal evidence depth
A purchase invoice can support a source-chain statement. It does not, by itself, prove botanical species, purity, chemical composition or performance.
Define what “traceable” means

Ingredient & Material Sourcing Records

Useful sourcing records should separate material identity, supplier identity, material origin, processing country and the lot references that connect the purchase to a finished product.

Material OriginWhere the botanical/material came from, when documented.
Supplier CountryWhere the supplier operates.
Processing CountryWhere processing or packing occurred.
A supplier in China does not prove a botanical was grown in China. “Made in China” also should not be used as a shortcut for plant-growing origin.
Ingredient / Material IDInternal traceability identifier
Common NameCurrent material/product name
Scientific NameOnly when that taxonomic identity is actually claimed and supported
Plant Part / Material FormLeaf, root, powder, oil, wood, film, device component, etc.
SupplierRecorded supplier identity
Supplier LotSupplier’s material lot when available
SanYuan LotInternal lot / receipt linkage
Purchase / POPurchase reference and received date
SpecificationRelevant material or product specification
Evidence IDsLinks to current photos, specs, COAs or reports
Small glass jars of dried botanicals beside a blank card, a blank deckled sheet and a magnifying glass
Illustrative editorial photo. Sourcing records are confirmed per supplier and lot record.
Botanical identity changes when the product changes

Botanical Identity & Formula Control

Common names can refer to several taxa or plant parts. Formula and label control keep the public product identity synchronized with the material and evidence that actually apply.

Useful identity & formula records

Accepted scientific name — when claimed
Chinese name / Pinyin — when verified
Plant part
Supplier specification
Formula version
Ingredient amount / ratio internally
Current label
Linked evidence IDs
FORMULA_VERSION++
→ recheck public ingredient copy
→ recheck label
→ recheck allergen status
→ recheck evidence links
→ recheck product schema
Fresh mugwort branches and dried mugwort leaves arranged on cream paper with a stoneware bowl
Illustrative editorial photo. Botanical identity is confirmed per formula and specification record.
Practical lot chain

Batch Traceability

Public evidence does not need to reveal confidential pricing or personal data. It should reveal enough linkage to establish which product, batch, report and date belong together.

Step 1Supplier
Step 2Supplier Lot
Step 3SanYuan Material Lot
Step 4Product Batch
Step 5Finished SKU
Step 6Market / Distribution Record
If traceability currently reaches only the recorded supplier and lot, say that. Do not claim “farm-to-cup traceability” without a full origin chain.
A COA is an evidence type, not a magic badge

Testing, COAs & Laboratory Reports

A COA may be issued by a supplier, manufacturer, laboratory or another qualified source. Public evidence should identify who issued it, which lot/batch it covers and what it actually reports.

COA ≠ automatically independent third-party testing. “Tested” ≠ “zero.” A limited pesticide panel ≠ “pesticide-free.”
Heavy Metals

Report the analytes and measured result

Where relevant, testing may include lead, cadmium, arsenic or mercury. Public evidence should show the actual analytes, units, limits/specifications and result.

Pesticides

Show the panel, method and scope

If a screen is performed, show the sample, defined panel/method, reporting limits where available and the actual result.

Microbiology

Product and market determine the specification

Records may include total counts, yeast/mold or specified pathogens when appropriate. Do not publish one universal limit for every product type.

Product-Specific Testing

Not all useful evidence is lab chemistry

Examples include low-smoke incense, warming-patch temperature/adhesion, foot-soak bag integrity, body-oil records and device model measurements.

Speckled ceramic bowls of dried botanicals on sage-green linen
Illustrative editorial photo. Testing and COA details are confirmed per published evidence record.
Food evidence must match the current label

Allergens & Label Verification

For foods, the current formula, allergen declaration, any supported cross-contact statement and the final market label should be reviewed together.

Current Formula

Use the formula/BOM version that actually applies to the live SKU.

Allergen Declaration

Declare allergens from the current product record and market requirements.

Cross-Contact

Only publish facility or cross-contact statements when supported by supplier/facility evidence.

Gift Sets

Each food component keeps its own allergen information inside a bundle.

One quality template does not fit every category

Quality by Product Type

Food, incense, external-use products, body oils and devices have different evidence priorities. P023 organizes the framework; SKU pages and evidence libraries own the specific facts.

Foods & Drinks

Herbal Foods & Drinks

  • ingredient list / BOM
  • botanical identity
  • allergens
  • net quantity
  • supplier / lot
  • contaminant evidence as applicable
Combustible

Incense & Moxa

  • exact material
  • binder / core
  • species/source where claimed
  • burn information
  • smoke evidence
  • fire instructions
External Use

Foot Soaks & External Wellness

  • full formula
  • bag/material
  • use instructions
  • warnings
  • market classification
Cosmetic

Botanical Body Oils

  • INCI
  • formula
  • safety assessment
  • market notification / Responsible Person
  • label
Device

Light Therapy Devices

  • manufacturer/model
  • instructions
  • wavelength/light source
  • output/specs
  • regulatory identity
  • warranty
Evidence must change when the product changes

Change Control & Recall Readiness

Quality includes knowing when old evidence no longer applies and having records that support correction, withdrawal or recall actions when required.

Change control

What can trigger a new review?

New supplier
Species or material change
Ingredient-ratio or fragrance/binder change
Manufacturing-process change
New device model
Packaging/contact-material change
Revised instructions or market label
Ask: does the old evidence still apply? If yes, document why. If no, archive the old evidence and collect new evidence.
Corrective-action readiness

What should the record system support?

Identify affected SKU / lot
Stop sale when required
Find supplier / material records
Identify affected customers / markets as legally appropriate
Correct labels / site content
Document root cause
Update evidence and linked claims
The page explains readiness structure. It does not invent “zero recalls” or a recall history that has not been documented.
Evidence belongs to a subject, batch and scope

Published Testing & Evidence

P023 is the trust/navigation hub. Individual public COAs, lab reports, first-party tests and evidence records belong in the Testing & Evidence Library.

Open the Testing & Evidence Library

Evidence Library Framework

Process Standard

Public evidence cards should include Evidence ID, Product/Material, Batch, Evidence Type, Issuer/Lab, Date, Status and Limitations.

No additional public evidence records are loaded into this HTML preview. Real evidence cards can be injected dynamically without changing the page URL or index status.
Read the report, not the badge

Questions to Ask When Reading a Test Report

A generic “Lab Tested” icon gives very little information. Stronger evidence makes the product, batch, sample, method, result, specification and limitations visible.

Is the product or material clearly identified?
Is there a lot or batch number?
When was the sample tested?
Who collected or submitted the sample?
Who performed or issued the test?
What method or analytes were used?
What were the results and units?
What specification or limit is being compared?
Does the report apply to the current formula?
Does it support the exact public claim?
A blank card and a spiral-bound notebook beside the rim of a magnifying glass on wood samples
Illustrative editorial photo. Report details are confirmed per published evidence record.
Evidence-first answers

Frequently Asked Questions

The FAQ avoids universal testing claims and points back to exact product, batch and evidence scope.

How do you test Chinese herbal products?

The test depends on the product and risk. SanYuan Herbs links testing to a specific material, SKU or batch and records the issuer or lab, test scope, date, result and limitations whenever a test is used publicly.

Are all batches tested for heavy metals?

Do not assume a universal panel. The Evidence Library should state exactly which batch was tested and for which analytes.

Are your herbs pesticide-free?

A pesticide test covers a defined method or panel. SanYuan Herbs should publish the actual scope and results rather than use an unlimited “pesticide-free” claim without evidence.

Where do your herbs come from?

Source information is published to the level supported by purchasing and specification records. Supplier location, botanical origin and processing country are treated as separate facts.

What is a COA?

A Certificate of Analysis reports specifications or analytical results for a defined material, product or batch. The issuer and applicable lot should be visible.

Is a supplier COA third-party testing?

No—not automatically. The evidence type should say whether the document came from a supplier, manufacturer or independent laboratory.

How do you handle formula or supplier changes?

Material changes trigger a review of labels, product copy, linked evidence and affected claims before old evidence is reused.

Do you have a recall process?

SanYuan Herbs’ quality data structure should make product and lot records usable for correction or recall actions when required. Market-specific legal procedures depend on product and country.