Wrap
Flexible positioning around a body area; fit and source placement depend on the exact design.
Compare devices by model-specific parameters and intended use—not by assuming a wavelength, “cold laser” label or red-light form factor proves a medical claim.
Home light-therapy devices can look similar while differing in laser vs LED source, wavelength, output, coverage, form factor, session instructions, intended use and regulatory status.
LLLT/PBM/red-light terminology can overlap in marketing, but the actual light source, optical parameters, intended use and regulatory identity must be recorded per model. A wearable form factor or a 660/808 nm label does not automatically establish a treatment claim.
Unverified intended-use, optical and regulatory fields stay “Not published.” No model borrows another device’s status.
Form factor affects contact, positioning, coverage, convenience and fit. It does not establish effectiveness by itself.
Flexible positioning around a body area; fit and source placement depend on the exact design.
Broad wearable coverage, with exact contact and body-area guidance from the IFU.
Flat coverage and positioning; output/dose still need model data.
More manual targeting and session workflow.
Wearable support shape; do not infer medical indication from the brace form.
P086 labels the actual technology instead of treating consumer phrases as regulatory synonyms.
A broad concept used in technical/regulatory literature.
Commonly used for low-level laser/light devices, but exact source and intended use still matter.
May refer to red LEDs, near-infrared LEDs, lasers or mixed sources. The device record should disclose what is actually present.
Where verified, compare the full optical record. If not measured, mark it unpublished.
Identify emitter type.
Do not reduce the device to “660/808 nm.”
Measured values only.
Session + output context where applicable.
Geometry and fit shape the exposure.
Map a device to a body area only when the IFU/intended use supports it.
A “knee device” cannot automatically be used on the back, and a belt form factor does not authorize every body area. Current body-area compatibility should render per model.
Each model gets its own row. US, Canada, UK and Australia status are not inherited.
Technical testing, human evidence and regulatory evidence should never be collapsed into one vague “clinically proven” badge.
Wavelength, output, electrical/laser safety, battery and thermal behavior.
Only exact relevant evidence, with model relationship disclosed.
Submission, registration, listing or other market-specific status for that model.
Start with the routine/body area supported by the device.
Compare fit and treatment area.
Laser, LED or mixed.
Check wavelengths and measured output/dose.
Use the exact IFU claim.
Verify per model and country.
Separate technical, human and regulatory proof.
Compare safety and session instructions.
Compare warranty, price and stock.
Not necessarily.
No universal claim.
Only if that exact model has a verified record.
No category-wide treatment claim.
Only if its instructions support that use.
Not automatically.
Compare exact device evidence.
Follow the exact IFU.